The Customer Service and Support group at the Bank is continually interested in all promising opportunities and technologies that increase responsiveness and operational efficiency for customer service operations. Instead of accepting “Trust us – Our schedules are optimal” claims, the Customer Service and Support group wanted to understand the efficiency of agent schedules generated by their Workforce Management (WFM) Software. Here, the desire was to evaluate the efficiency of the schedules generated by their WFM system and identify opportunities offered by the concurrent optimal scheduling technology provided by the AWO Optimal Scheduler.
The AWO Optimal Scheduler has the new generation scheduling technology to minimize total costs or scheduled agent time, and determine schedules with the highest efficiency possible in a contact center environment. This is achieved using ac2’s proprietary mathematical optimization models and optimization algorithms for concurrent optimal scheduling. Agent and skills requirements, work rules, and an astronomical number of possible schedules all factor into AWO’s mathematical models and algorithms.
In order to determine how “optimal” the schedules generated by their WFM software are, the Customer Services and Support group developed a plan to benchmark its agent scheduling capabilities with ac2’s Optimal Scheduler over a target week. For benchmarking their WFM software, the Bank selected one of its contact center environments involving:
Using the same contact center data, weekly agent schedules were generated by the AWO Optimal Scheduler and The Bank’s WFM software and evaluated by the Customer Services and Support group for adherence to weekly tour, daily shift and break scheduling parameters, agent and skills availability, operating hours, etc.
The AWO Optimal Scheduler showed a remarkable advantage and improvement opportunities in all metrics over the WFM software used by The Bank. Major benefits realized included:
Using the data driven benchmarking approach, the Bank developed a road map to increase efficiency, impacting both services and bottom line.
9.3% savings in agent costs
99% schedule efficiency
77% reduction in excess agent hours
100% elimination of agent shortages
45-70 seconds reduction in ASA
One of the top 2 banks in the U.S. serving 29 states, and 175 countries
A top three traditional WFM vendor
33
9,700